On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 05:59:50PM +0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > On 6/25/25 12:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 03:34:55PM +0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > >> On 6/25/25 10:17 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > Probably gpiod_set_debounce() should become a no-op in this case? > > But my point is this 50 needs to be a quirk /somewhere/. It shouldn't > be a default behavior. > > It can be in the GPIO driver(s), it can be in soc-button-array, or it > can be in gpio_keys. > > I've got an idea mocked up for a v2, I'll send that out and I think we > can discuss the merits of it on that series. Sure, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
