On 10/14/2024 3:00 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 13:57, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:07:13AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>> Jason Tian (1): >>> RAS: Report all ARM processor CPER information to userspace >>> >>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab (4): >>> efi/cper: Adjust infopfx size to accept an extra space >>> efi/cper: Add a new helper function to print bitmasks >>> efi/cper: align ARM CPER type with UEFI 2.9A/2.10 specs >>> docs: efi: add CPER functions to driver-api >>> >>> .../driver-api/firmware/efi/index.rst | 11 +++- >>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 27 ++++---- >>> drivers/firmware/efi/cper-arm.c | 52 ++++++++-------- >>> drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++- >>> drivers/ras/ras.c | 41 +++++++++++- >>> include/linux/cper.h | 12 ++-- >>> include/linux/ras.h | 16 ++++- >>> include/ras/ras_event.h | 48 ++++++++++++-- >>> 8 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) >> >> With the issues to patch 1 fixed: >> >> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> I'm presuming this'll go through Ard's tree. Alternatively, I can pick it up >> too with Ard's ack. >> > > Either works for me. > > Mauro: please put all maintainers on cc of the code you are touching - thanks. What can I do to help this patch move forward? I noticed it needs to be rebased as of kernel v6.15. Would it be helpful if I were to rebase, add all the maintainers to the cc, and resubmit ? I did rebase to v6.15 and tested. Everything still seems good to go.
