Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] x86: Handle KCOV __init vs inline mismatches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22 May 2025, Kees Cook wrote:

> When KCOV is enabled all functions get instrumented, unless the
> __no_sanitize_coverage attribute is used. To prepare for
> __no_sanitize_coverage being applied to __init functions, we have to
> handle differences in how GCC's inline optimizations get resolved. For
> x86 this means forcing several functions to be inline with
> __always_inline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <linux-trace-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index e7350c9fa3aa..0518d5b1f4ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -559,12 +559,12 @@ static unsigned long __init tpacpi_check_quirks(
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool __pure __init tpacpi_is_lenovo(void)
> +static __always_inline bool __pure tpacpi_is_lenovo(void)
>  {
>  	return thinkpad_id.vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_LENOVO;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool __pure __init tpacpi_is_ibm(void)
> +static __always_inline bool __pure tpacpi_is_ibm(void)
>  {
>  	return thinkpad_id.vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM;
>  }

Hi Kees,

What's your plan on upstreaming route/timeline for this? I'd prefer to 
retain full control over this file as we were planning on some 
reorganization of files into lenovo/ subdir.


-- 
 i.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux