Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:35:16 +0800 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Joshua,
>>
>> Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > @@ -3707,8 +3720,12 @@ static void wi_state_free(void)
>> > kfree(&wi_group->wi_kobj);
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static struct kobj_attribute wi_auto_attr =
>> > + __ATTR(auto, 0664, weighted_interleave_auto_show,
>> > + weighted_interleave_auto_store);
>> > +
>> > static void wi_cleanup(void) {
>> > - sysfs_remove_file(&wi_group->wi_kobj, &wi_group->auto_kobj_attr.attr);
>> > + sysfs_remove_file(&wi_group->wi_kobj, &wi_auto_attr.attr);
>>
>> If we use wi_auto_attr directly here, we can remove auto_kobj_attr field
>> from struct sysfs_wi_group?
>
> Hi Ying, thank you for this comment. I should have caught it as well.
> Removing the last users / setters doesn't seem complicated.
>
> Andrew, I'm very sorry -- do you think you can fold this fixlet in as well?
> This is a minor change that removes the only users of this variable.
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index d5ae36d2eda8..8581cc861945 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -3543,7 +3543,6 @@ struct iw_node_attr {
> struct sysfs_wi_group {
> struct kobject wi_kobj;
> struct mutex kobj_lock;
> - struct kobj_attribute auto_kobj_attr;
> struct iw_node_attr *nattrs[];
> };
>
> @@ -3833,7 +3832,6 @@ static int __init add_weighted_interleave_group(struct kobject *mempolicy_kobj)
> err = sysfs_create_file(&wi_group->wi_kobj, &wi_auto_attr.attr);
> if (err)
> goto err_put_kobj;
> - wi_group->auto_kobj_attr = wi_auto_attr
>
> for_each_online_node(nid) {
> if (!node_state(nid, N_MEMORY))
>
> Thank you both, I hope you have a great day!
Thanks! LGTM, please feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
