On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:13:02PM +0000, Heyne, Maximilian wrote:
> Commit 7ab4f0e37a0f ("ACPI PPTT: Fix coding mistakes in a couple of
> sizeof() calls") corrects the processer entry size but unmasked a longer
> standing bug where the last entry in the structure can get skipped due
> to an off-by-one mistake if the last entry ends exactly at the end of
> the ACPI subtable.
>
Unless the firmware has populated an incorrect value for the header length, I
don't see how this is possible. The table_end should point to the address
immediately following the last byte of the table. None of the headers are only
one byte long, so what am I missing that could explain this apparent
off-by-one issue?.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
