Re: [PATCH v1 24/36] ata: libata-eh: drop nth_page() usage within SG entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 24/36] ata: libata-eh: drop nth_page() usage within SG entry
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 13:24:45 +0900
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>, kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>, Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, wireguard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250827220141.262669-25-david@redhat.com>
Organization: Western Digital Research
References: <20250827220141.262669-1-david@redhat.com> <20250827220141.262669-25-david@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 8/28/25 7:01 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> It's no longer required to use nth_page() when iterating pages within a
> single SG entry, so let's drop the nth_page() usage.
> 
> Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

References:
- [PATCH v1 00/36] mm: remove nth_page()
  - From: David Hildenbrand
- [PATCH v1 24/36] ata: libata-eh: drop nth_page() usage within SG entry
  - From: David Hildenbrand

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] A fix and cleanup around qio_channel_socket_connect_sync()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] vhost_task: Fix a bug where KVM wakes an exited task
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 24/36] ata: libata-eh: drop nth_page() usage within SG entry
Next by thread: [PATCH v1 27/36] memstick: drop nth_page() usage within SG entry
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]