Re: [PATCH v1 12/36] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/36] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx()
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:18:31 +0000
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>, kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>, Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, wireguard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0e1c0fe1-4dd1-46dc-8ce8-a6bf6e4c3e80@redhat.com>
References: <20250827220141.262669-1-david@redhat.com> <20250827220141.262669-13-david@redhat.com> <20250828074356.3xiuqugokg36yuxw@master> <0e1c0fe1-4dd1-46dc-8ce8-a6bf6e4c3e80@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 09:46:25AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> 
>> Curious about why it is in page-flags.h. It seems not related to page-flags.
>
>Likely because we have the page_folio() in there as well.
>

Hmm... sorry for this silly question.

>-- 
>Cheers
>
>David / dhildenb

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

References:
- [PATCH v1 00/36] mm: remove nth_page()
  - From: David Hildenbrand
- [PATCH v1 12/36] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx()
  - From: David Hildenbrand
- Re: [PATCH v1 12/36] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx()
  - From: Wei Yang
- Re: [PATCH v1 12/36] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx()
  - From: David Hildenbrand

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 10/36] mm: sanity-check maximum folio size in folio_set_order()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 11/36] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 12/36] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx()
Next by thread: [PATCH v1 06/36] mm/page_alloc: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in alloc_contig_range_noprof()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]