On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 04:35:00PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 03:35:29PM +0800, Hou Wenlong wrote: > >The commit a377ac1cd9d7b ("x86/entry: Move user return notifier out of > >loop") moved fire_user_return_notifiers() into the section with > >interrupts disabled, so the callback kvm_on_user_return() cannot be > >interrupted by kvm_arch_disable_virtualization_cpu() now. Therefore, > >remove the outdated comments and local_irq_save()/local_irq_restore() > >code in kvm_on_user_return(). > > > >Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 +++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > >index 33fba801b205..10afbacb1851 100644 > >--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > >+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > >@@ -568,18 +568,12 @@ static void kvm_on_user_return(struct user_return_notifier *urn) > > struct kvm_user_return_msrs *msrs > > = container_of(urn, struct kvm_user_return_msrs, urn); > > struct kvm_user_return_msr_values *values; > >- unsigned long flags; > > > >- /* > >- * Disabling irqs at this point since the following code could be > >- * interrupted and executed through kvm_arch_disable_virtualization_cpu() > >- */ > >- local_irq_save(flags); > >- if (msrs->registered) { > >- msrs->registered = false; > >- user_return_notifier_unregister(urn); > >- } > >- local_irq_restore(flags); > >+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); > > kvm_offline_cpu() may call into this function. But I am not sure if interrupts > are disabled in that path. > Thanks for pointing that out. I see that interrupts are enabled in the callback during the CPU offline test. I'll remove the lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() here. > Documentation/core-api/cpu_hotplug.rst says that callbacks in the ONLINE section > are invoked with interrupts and preemption enabled. > > >+ > >+ msrs->registered = false; > >+ user_return_notifier_unregister(urn); > >+ > > for (slot = 0; slot < kvm_nr_uret_msrs; ++slot) { > > values = &msrs->values[slot]; > > if (values->host != values->curr) { > >-- > >2.31.1 > > > >