On 8/13/25 9:05 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Sagi Shahar wrote:
..
>> + td_finalize(vm);
>> +
>> + printf("Verifying UPM functionality: explicit MapGPA\n");
>
> Not sure if Sean's comment regarding printf applies here.
>
> Personally, I don't mind the noise in the output. But I am running things
> by hand. I can see how having no output on success is a good thing when
> running a suite of tests.
Switching these to ksft_print_msg() could be an option that supports both
usages. ksft_print_msg() adds the "#" diagnostic prefix that should be ignored
by automation that is expected to understand TAP13.
Reinette
