On 05.08.25 15:15, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 16:05, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So I don't like the idea of micro-optimizing num_pages_contiguous() by
adding weird tweaks to the core for that.
Seriously - take a look at that suggested sequence I posted, and tell
me that it isn't *MORE* obvious than the horror that is nth_page().
It is, that's not what I am talking about. I was talking about proposals
to make it work in a different way as Jason proposed.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
