Re: [PATCH v17 14/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Enforce guest_memfd's max order when recovering hugepages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/30/2025 6:54 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Rework kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level() to provide the plumbing to consult
guest_memfd (and relevant vendor code) when recovering hugepages, e.g.
after disabling live migration.  The flaw has existed since guest_memfd was
originally added, but has gone unnoticed due to lack of guest_memfd support
for hugepages or dirty logging.

Don't actually call into guest_memfd at this time, as it's unclear as to
what the API should be.  Ideally, KVM would simply use kvm_gmem_get_pfn(),
but invoking kvm_gmem_get_pfn() would lead to sleeping in atomic context
if guest_memfd needed to allocate memory (mmu_lock is held).  Luckily,
the path isn't actually reachable, so just add a TODO and WARN to ensure
the functionality is added alongisde guest_memfd hugepage support, and
punt the guest_memfd API design question to the future.

Note, calling kvm_mem_is_private() in the non-fault path is safe, so long
as mmu_lock is held, as hugepage recovery operates on shadow-present SPTEs,
i.e. calling kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level() with @fault=NULL is mutually
exclusive with kvm_vm_set_mem_attributes() changing the PRIVATE attribute
of the gfn.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 82 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h |  2 +-
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      |  2 +-
  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 20dd9f64156e..61eb9f723675 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3302,31 +3302,54 @@ static u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
  	return PG_LEVEL_4K;
  }
-static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
-					u8 max_level, int gmem_order)
+static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
+					const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)

I don't see why slot and gfn are needed here. Just to keep consistent with host_pfn_mapping_level()?

  {
-	u8 req_max_level;
+	u8 max_level, coco_level;
+	kvm_pfn_t pfn;
- if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
-		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
+	/* For faults, use the gmem information that was resolved earlier. */
+	if (fault) {
+		pfn = fault->pfn;
+		max_level = fault->max_level;
+	} else {
+		/* TODO: Call into guest_memfd once hugepages are supported. */
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "Get pfn+order from guest_memfd");
+		pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
+		max_level = PG_LEVEL_4K;
+	}
- max_level = min(kvm_max_level_for_order(gmem_order), max_level);
  	if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
-		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
+		return max_level;
- req_max_level = kvm_x86_call(gmem_max_mapping_level)(kvm, pfn);
-	if (req_max_level)
-		max_level = min(max_level, req_max_level);
+	/*
+	 * CoCo may influence the max mapping level, e.g. due to RMP or S-EPT
+	 * restrictions.  A return of '0' means "no additional restrictions", to
+	 * allow for using an optional "ret0" static call.
+	 */
+	coco_level = kvm_x86_call(gmem_max_mapping_level)(kvm, pfn);
+	if (coco_level)
+		max_level = min(max_level, coco_level);
return max_level;
  }
-static int __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
-				       const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-				       gfn_t gfn, int max_level, bool is_private)
+int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
+			      const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
  {
  	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
-	int host_level;
+	int host_level, max_level;
+	bool is_private;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	if (fault) {
+		max_level = fault->max_level;
+		is_private = fault->is_private;
+	} else {
+		max_level = PG_LEVEL_NUM;
+		is_private = kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn);
+	}
max_level = min(max_level, max_huge_page_level);
  	for ( ; max_level > PG_LEVEL_4K; max_level--) {
@@ -3335,25 +3358,16 @@ static int __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
  			break;
  	}
+ if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
+		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
+
  	if (is_private)
-		return max_level;
-
-	if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
-		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
-
-	host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, slot);
+		host_level = kvm_max_private_mapping_level(kvm, fault, slot, gfn);
+	else
+		host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, slot);
  	return min(host_level, max_level);
  }
-int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
-			      const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
-{
-	bool is_private = kvm_slot_has_gmem(slot) &&
-			  kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn);
-
-	return __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_NUM, is_private);
-}
-
  void kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
  {
  	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = fault->slot;
@@ -3374,9 +3388,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault
  	 * Enforce the iTLB multihit workaround after capturing the requested
  	 * level, which will be used to do precise, accurate accounting.
  	 */
-	fault->req_level = __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, slot,
-						       fault->gfn, fault->max_level,
-						       fault->is_private);
+	fault->req_level = kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, fault,
+						     fault->slot, fault->gfn);
  	if (fault->req_level == PG_LEVEL_4K || fault->huge_page_disallowed)
  		return;
@@ -4564,8 +4577,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  	}
fault->map_writable = !(fault->slot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY);
-	fault->max_level = kvm_max_private_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, fault->pfn,
-							 fault->max_level, max_order);
+	fault->max_level = kvm_max_level_for_order(max_order);
return RET_PF_CONTINUE;
  }
@@ -7165,7 +7177,7 @@ static bool kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte(struct kvm *kvm,
  		 * mapping if the indirect sp has level = 1.
  		 */
  		if (sp->role.direct &&
-		    sp->role.level < kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot, sp->gfn)) {
+		    sp->role.level < kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, NULL, slot, sp->gfn)) {
  			kvm_zap_one_rmap_spte(kvm, rmap_head, sptep);
if (kvm_available_flush_remote_tlbs_range())
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 65f3c89d7c5d..b776be783a2f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static inline int kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
  	return r;
  }
-int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
+int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
  			      const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
  void kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault);
  void disallowed_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_page_fault *fault, u64 spte, int cur_level);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 7f3d7229b2c1..740cb06accdb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ static void recover_huge_pages_range(struct kvm *kvm,
  		if (iter.gfn < start || iter.gfn >= end)
  			continue;
- max_mapping_level = kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot, iter.gfn);
+		max_mapping_level = kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, NULL, slot, iter.gfn);
  		if (max_mapping_level < iter.level)
  			continue;





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux