Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic code

To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic code
From: Bibo Mao <maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:49:59 +0800
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250723214659.064b5d4a@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20250722094734.4920545b@gandalf.local.home> <2c2f5036-c3ae-3904-e940-8a8b71a65957@loongson.cn> <20250723214659.064b5d4a@gandalf.local.home>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux loongarch64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0



On 2025/7/24 上午9:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:39:40 +0800
Bibo Mao <maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

   #define kvm_fpu_load_symbol	\
   	{0, "unload"},		\
   	{1, "load"}

Reviewed-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks,

Should this go through the loongarch tree or should I take it?

Huacai,

What is your point about this?

Regards
Bibo Mao


Either way works for me.

-- Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic code
  - From: Huacai Chen

References:
- [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic code
  - From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic code
  - From: Bibo Mao
- Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic code
  - From: Steven Rostedt