On Wed, Jul 16, 2025, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > On 7/11/2025 10:19 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > ... > > > > > > I'm wondering if we need a TDX centralized enumeration interface, e.g., new > > > field in struct kvm_tdx_capabilities. I believe there will be more and more > > > TDX new features, and assigning each a KVM_CAP seems wasteful. > > > > Oh, yeah, that's a much better idea. In addition to not polluting KVM_CAP, > > > > LOL, and we certainly have the capacity in the structure: > > > > __u64 reserved[250]; > > > > Sans documentation, something like so? > > I suppose it will be squashed into the original patch, I dropped the commit from kvm-x86/vmx, and will send a full v5. There's enough moving parts that I don't want to risk going 'round in circles trying to squash fixes :-) > so just gave > > Tested-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks!
