On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:26:13 +0100, Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 at 11:36, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > > A note that on the KVM arm next tree > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git/log/?h=next > > > > there are some user_mem_abort() changes. IIUC, only smaller conflicts. > > Thanks for the heads up. I can work with Marc and Oliver to resolve > any conflicts once we get there. Yup. Ideally, a stable branch, based on an -rc tag, would do the trick and allow us to solve the conflicts ahead of this hitting -next. We can either take that in the kvmarm tree, or from the main kvm repo. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
