On 7/13/2025 12:16 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:38:08PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote: >> It was more to imply like secure APIC-page rather than Secure-APIC page. I will change >> it to secure_avic_page or savic_apic_page, if one of these looks cleaner. Please suggest. > > If the page belongs to the guest's secure AVIC machinery then it should be > called secure_avic_page to avoid confusion. Or at least have a comment above > it explaining what it is. > Ok. I will change this to secure_avic_page in next version. Thanks for taking a look at it during weekend. - Neeraj
