On 7/8/25 07:24, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> That file list is getting a bit long, but it _is_ the truth. > What about adding > > K: tdx > > instead of listing each file individually? That might also help clarify what's > up for cases where there is overlap, e.g. with KVM, to convey that this is a > "secondary" entry of sorts. Good idea. There are a couple of "tdx" things in the tree that aren't TDX, but: N: tdx K: \b(tdx) seems like it might be a _bit_ more precise. I don't see any filenames with "tdx" in them that are false positives.
