Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 02/16] x86: Encode X86_FEATURE_* definitions using a structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> On 5/30/2025 6:19 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_SVM			X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, ECX, 2)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE	X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, ECX, 23)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_NX			X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 20)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 26)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 27)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_LM			X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 29)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_RDPRU		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 4)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 12)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_NPT			X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 0)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_LBRV		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 1)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_NRIPS		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 3)
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_TSCRATEMSR		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 4)
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_PAUSEFILTER		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 10)
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_PFTHRESHOLD		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 12)
> > +#define	X86_FEATURE_VGIF		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 16)
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_VNMI		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 25)
> 
> The code looks good to me except the indent style (mixed tab and space).
> Although it's not introduced by this patch, we'd better make them identical
> by this chance.

Agreed, that is weird.  I didn't notice it in the code, but looking at this diff
again, it really stands out.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux