Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/8] x86: nVMX: Use set_bit() instead of test_and_set_bit() when return is ignored

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/6/2025 3:22 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use set_bit() in vmx_posted_interrupts_test_worker(), as the usage doesn't
> actually look at the original value.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  x86/vmx_tests.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/x86/vmx_tests.c b/x86/vmx_tests.c
> index 2f178227..53706000 100644
> --- a/x86/vmx_tests.c
> +++ b/x86/vmx_tests.c
> @@ -11122,8 +11122,8 @@ static void vmx_posted_interrupts_test_worker(void *data)
>  	while (!args->in_guest)
>  		pause();
>  
> -	test_and_set_bit(args->nr, args->pi_desc);
> -	test_and_set_bit(256, args->pi_desc);
> +	set_bit(args->nr, args->pi_desc);
> +	set_bit(256, args->pi_desc);
>  	apic_icr_write(PI_VECTOR, args->dest);
>  }
>  

Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>






[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux