On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 4:08 PM Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 23 May 2025 23:29:49 +0000 > David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > +{ > > + char *bdf; > > + > > + if (argc != 2) { > > + printf("Usage: %s bus:device:function\n", argv[0]); > > segment:bus:device.function? Oops, yes. Will fix in the next version. > > > + return 1; > > 1 or KSFT_FAIL? Yeah KSFT_FAIL is probably the better option. Thanks.