On 5/15/25 08:41, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I kindly request your consideration for merging this series. Most of >> patches have received Reviewed-by/Acked-by tags. > I don't see anything objectionable in this series. > > The upcoming v6.16 merge window is already quite crowded in terms of > FPU changes, so I think at this point we are looking at a v6.17 merge, > done shortly after v6.16-rc1 if everything goes well. Dave, what do you > think? It's getting into shape, but it has a slight shortage of reviews. For now, it's an all-Intel patch even though I _thought_ AMD had this feature too. It's also purely for KVM and has some suggested-by's from Sean, but no KVM acks on it. I have the feeling Sean would speak up if this was going in a bad direction for KVM, but I do love to see acks accompanying suggested-by's to indicate that the suggestion was interpreted properly.
