On Apr 26, 2025 Chathura Rajapaksha <chathura.abeyrathne.lk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Some PCIe devices trigger PCI bus errors when accesses are made to
> unassigned regions within their PCI configuration space. On certain
> platforms, this can lead to host system hangs or reboots.
>
> The current vfio-pci driver allows guests to access unassigned regions
> in the PCI configuration space. Therefore, when such a device is passed
> through to a guest, the guest can induce a host system hang or reboot
> through crafted configuration space accesses, posing a threat to
> system availability.
>
> This patch introduces auditing support for config space accesses to
> unassigned regions. When enabled, this logs such accesses for all
> passthrough devices.
> This feature is controlled via a new Kconfig option:
>
> CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_UNASSIGNED_ACCESS_AUDIT
>
> A new audit event type, AUDIT_VFIO, has been introduced to support
> this, allowing administrators to monitor and investigate suspicious
> behavior by guests.
I try to encourage people to put a sample audit record in the commit
description as it helps others, even those not overly familiar with the
Linux kernel, know what to expect in the audit log and provide feedback.
> Co-developed by: William Wang <xwill@xxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: William Wang <xwill@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chathura Rajapaksha <chath@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> index cb4d11aa5598..ddd10904d60f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/vfio.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/audit.h>
>
> #include "vfio_pci_priv.h"
>
> @@ -1980,6 +1981,37 @@ static size_t vfio_pci_cap_remaining_dword(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> return i;
> }
>
> +enum vfio_audit {
> + VFIO_AUDIT_READ,
> + VFIO_AUDIT_WRITE,
> + VFIO_AUDIT_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const vfio_audit_str[VFIO_AUDIT_MAX] = {
> + [VFIO_AUDIT_READ] = "READ",
> + [VFIO_AUDIT_WRITE] = "WRITE",
> +};
We generally don't capitalize things like this in audit, "read" and
"write" would be preferred.
> +static void vfio_audit_access(const struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos, bool blocked, unsigned int op)
> +{
> + struct audit_buffer *ab;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(op >= VFIO_AUDIT_MAX))
> + return;
> + if (audit_enabled == AUDIT_OFF)
> + return;
> + ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_VFIO);
> + if (unlikely(!ab))
> + return;
> + audit_log_format(ab,
> + "device=%04x:%02x:%02x.%d access=%s offset=0x%llx size=%ld blocked=%u\n",
> + pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), pdev->bus->number,
> + PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn),
> + vfio_audit_str[op], *ppos, count, blocked);
> + audit_log_end(ab);
> +}
In the commit description you talk about a general PCIe device issue
in the first paragraph before going into the specifics of the VFIO
driver. That's all well and good, but it makes me wonder if this
audit code above is better done as a generic PCI function that other
PCI drivers could use if they had similar concerns? Please correct
me if I'm wrong, but other than symbol naming I don't see anyting
above which is specific to VFIO. Thoughts?
Beyond that, I might also change the "access=" field to "op=" as we
already use the "op=" field name for similar things in audit, it would
be good to leverage that familiarity here. Similarly using "res=",
specifically "res=0" for failure/blocked or "res=1" allowed, would
better fit with audit conventions.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> index 9a4ecc9f6dc5..c0aace7384f3 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@
> #define AUDIT_OPENAT2 1337 /* Record showing openat2 how args */
> #define AUDIT_DM_CTRL 1338 /* Device Mapper target control */
> #define AUDIT_DM_EVENT 1339 /* Device Mapper events */
> +#define AUDIT_VFIO 1340 /* VFIO events */
If the audit code above becomes more generalized as discussed, I would
expect this to change to AUDIT_VFIO to AUDIT_PCI, or something similar.
--
paul-moore.com
