Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Manali Shukla <manali.shukla@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 12:01:04 -0700
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, nikunj@xxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <ff1f0e75-a13c-4f6f-82db-94dc600d6367@amd.com>
References: <20250502050346.14274-1-manali.shukla@amd.com> <ff1f0e75-a13c-4f6f-82db-94dc600d6367@amd.com>

On Mon, May 12, 2025, Manali Shukla wrote:
> A gentle reminder to review patches

(a) Trim your replies.

(b) Don't do whatever you did that generated 8 bajillion "prerequisite-patch-id"
    lines, which causes b4 to barf.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold
  - From: Manali Shukla

References:
- [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold
  - From: Manali Shukla
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold
  - From: Manali Shukla

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] s390/uv: handle folios that cannot be split while dirty
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/51] 1G page support for guest_memfd
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for the Bus Lock Threshold
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux