Re: [RFC PATCH 06/21] KVM: TDX: Assert the reclaimed pages were mapped as expected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/21] KVM: TDX: Assert the reclaimed pages were mapped as expected
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 17:34:04 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx" <quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>, "david@xxxxxxxxxx" <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Zhiquan1" <zhiquan1.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "tabba@xxxxxxxxxx" <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx>, "vbabka@xxxxxxx" <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, "thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx" <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>, "michael.roth@xxxxxxx" <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>, "seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx" <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx" <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx" <ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>, "binbin.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <binbin.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Peng, Chao P" <chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxx>, "Du, Fan" <fan.du@xxxxxxxxx>, "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jroedel@xxxxxxx" <jroedel@xxxxxxx>, "Miao, Jun" <jun.miao@xxxxxxxxx>, "Shutemov, Kirill" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxx>, "pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx" <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <aCae0HX3URjeHwOh@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com>
References: <20250424030033.32635-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> <20250424030532.32756-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> <846bfd9ba7a3a2c6feb2d74b07c8cb1b42dcd323.camel@intel.com> <aCae0HX3URjeHwOh@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com>
User-agent: Evolution 3.44.4-0ubuntu2

On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 10:11 +0800, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > No callers in the series pass anything other than PG_LEVEL_4K, so do we need
> > this patch?
> Oh, this patch is only for future VM shutdown optimization where huge guest
> pages could be reclaimed.
> We can of couse include it in the VM shutdown optimization series if you think
> it's better.

I think it's better.

References:
- [RFC PATCH 00/21] KVM: TDX huge page support for private memory
  - From: Yan Zhao
- [RFC PATCH 06/21] KVM: TDX: Assert the reclaimed pages were mapped as expected
  - From: Yan Zhao
- Re: [RFC PATCH 06/21] KVM: TDX: Assert the reclaimed pages were mapped as expected
  - From: Edgecombe, Rick P
- Re: [RFC PATCH 06/21] KVM: TDX: Assert the reclaimed pages were mapped as expected
  - From: Yan Zhao

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] s390/uv: handle folios that cannot be split while dirty
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/21] KVM: TDX: Add a helper for WBINVD on huge pages with TD's keyID
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/21] KVM: TDX: Assert the reclaimed pages were mapped as expected
Next by thread: [RFC PATCH 07/21] KVM: TDX: Add a helper for WBINVD on huge pages with TD's keyID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]