2025-05-08T11:48:00+05:30, Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 5:02 PM Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The SBI reset state has only two variables -- pc and a1. >> The rest is known, so keep only the necessary information. >> >> The reset structures make sense if we want userspace to control the >> reset state (which we do), but I'd still remove them now and reintroduce >> with the userspace interface later -- we could probably have just a >> single reset state per VM, instead of a reset state for each VCPU. >> >> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Queued this patch for Linux-6.16 [5/5] was already applied, which means that [3/5] would be nicer with memset(&vcpu->arch.smstateen_csr, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.smstateen_csr)); in the new function (kvm_riscv_vcpu_context_reset) where we memset(0) the other csr context. Should I add a patch to do that in v2? Thanks.
