On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 07:24:09AM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote: >On 4/30/2025 11:29 AM, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: >> >> So let's drop the code but not the idea. Chang what do you think of that? >Sure, that makes sense. Thanks for bringing up this case. Yea, I agree with dropping vcpu_fpu_config.user_* for now. > >Staring at the struct guest_fpu fields, some of them appear to match with >fields in fpstate. In any case, I agree it would be helpful to consider a >follow-up series after this.
