[no subject]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



And before the SEV/SNP init support was moved to KVM from CCP module, doing SEV/SNP INIT could fail but that still
had KVM detecting SEV/SNP support enabled, so this moving SEV/SNP init stuff to KVM module from CCP driver is
consistent with the previous behavior.
 
Thanks,
Ashish

>> Regardless of what we decide on what the right behavior is, fail vs skip (I
>> don't mind the former) we can certainly do that over new patches rebased over
>> the new series.
> 
> FAIL, for sure.  Unless someone else pipes up with a good reason why they need
> to defer INIT_EX, that's Google's problem to solve.





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux