On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 04:43:26PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > + * Verify all indirect calls are kCFI adorned by checking for the > > + * UD2. Notably, doing __nocfi calls to regular (cfi) functions is > > + * broken. > > This "__nocfi calls" is confusing me. IIUC, there are two completely > different meanings for "nocfi": > > - __nocfi: disable the kcfi function entry stuff Ah, no. __nocfi is a bit of a mess, this is both the function entry thing, but also very much the caller verification stuff for indirect calls done inside this function. This leads to lovely stuff like: void (*foo)(void); static __always_inline __nocfi void nocfi_caller(void) { foo(); } void bar(void) { nocfi_caller(); foo(); } This actually compiles and has bar() have two distinctly different indirect calls to foo, while bar itself has a __cfi preamble. Anyway, let me have a poke at the annotation.