Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] KVM: TDX: Add sub-ioctl KVM_TDX_TERMINATE_VM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 6:20 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
> +static int tdx_terminate_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +       int r = 0;
> +
> +       guard(mutex)(&kvm->lock);
> +       cpus_read_lock();
> +
> +       if (!kvm_trylock_all_vcpus(kvm)) {

Does this need to be a trylock variant? Is userspace expected to keep
retrying this operation indefinitely?

> +               r = -EBUSY;
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       kvm_vm_dead(kvm);
> +       kvm_unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
> +
> +       __tdx_release_hkid(kvm, true);
> +out:
> +       cpus_read_unlock();
> +       return r;
> +}
> +





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux