On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote: > On 4/5/2025 1:08 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > Add a helper to get the physical address of the AVIC backing page, both > > to deduplicate code and to prepare for getting the address directly from > > apic->regs, at which point it won't be all that obvious that the address > > in question is what SVM calls the AVIC backing page. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 14 +++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c > > index f04010f66595..a1f4a08d35f5 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c > > @@ -243,14 +243,18 @@ int avic_vm_init(struct kvm *kvm) > > return err; > > } > > +static phys_addr_t avic_get_backing_page_address(struct vcpu_svm *svm) > > +{ > > + return __sme_set(page_to_phys(svm->avic_backing_page)); > > +} > > + > > Maybe why not introduce a generic function like... > > static phsys_addr_t page_to_phys_sme_set(struct page *page) > { > return __sme_set(page_to_phys(page)); > } > > and use it for avic_logical_id_table_page and > avic_physical_id_table_page as well. Because subsequent commits remove the "struct page" tracking (it's suboptimal and confusing), and I don't want to encourage that bad pattern in the future.