On Wed, Apr 02, 2025, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 4/2/25 14:12, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > > In any case, at this point I think we need to either double down on polishing > > this thing up (by pausing other work) and have a clear “please do this with > > these patches" request, or declare failure and argue for the smaller version. > > > > I guess I still lean towards keeping the optimization. But I do think it's worth > > considering at this point. > > I'm not quite feeling the same sense of panic and some need to pause > other work. This is thing is at v4. Between spring break and the merge > window, v4 hasn't gotten many eyeballs, except Chang's (thanks Chang!). This particular series is at v4, but KVM CET support was more or less ready to roll 4 *years* ago. I agree there's no need to panic, but some sense of urgency would be nice.
