Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I do not agree the thread came to that conclusion. I see people
> disagreed and stop the discussion, because everyone agreed the
> draft in question to make Suite B historic was not disputed.
> People outside the IETF do not understand the subtleties of different
> IETF streams, and having an RFC is seen as a stamp of approval of
> the international community. Therefore, I do indeed believe we should
> not make the same mistake again.
I agree with Paul.
Further, it makes it look like the NSA has a priviledged position,
particularly when it writes things the way it did.
> The USG seems to be doing a fine job making FIPS publications available
> without these being enshrined in RFCs.
> I am against the IETF publishing CNSA or any other nation state
> cryptography profiles.
As am I.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
