Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:51:23 +0000
Cc: Simon Josefsson <simon=40josefsson.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <aK3XMWzrnJPFrI4m@ubby>
References: <aKzK5qdwLUHSa3JL@ubby> <878qj67dcq.fsf@josefsson.org> <MN2PR17MB4031F73336C43683553B84B9CD39A@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <87y0r6i1p7.fsf@josefsson.org> <MN2PR17MB4031065DFE92FEBB87A23E15CD39A@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <aK3XMWzrnJPFrI4m@ubby>

Is there a rule somewhere that IETF documents (at least on the standards
track) MUST reference BCP 14?

Nothing in the formal RFCs that document how the IETF works. There’s an IESG statement: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
  - From: John C Klensin

References:
- Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
  - From: Simon Josefsson
- Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
  - From: Salz, Rich
- Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
  - From: Simon Josefsson
- Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
  - From: Salz, Rich
- Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
  - From: Nico Williams

Prev by Date: Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
Next by Date: Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
Previous by thread: Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
Next by thread: Re: Question about BCP 14 / RFC 8174
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux