I am writing in a personal capacity.
Please don't make fun of potential or actual litigants on the list.
It's unhelpful for setting the tone of discussion.
G
On Fri, 5 Sept 2025, 10:19 Paul Wouters, <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sent using a virtual keyboard on a phone
On Sep 4, 2025, at 18:40, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> At some point one has to wonder whether the term "vexatious litigant" applies here, or ought to.
>
> There have been a number of fairly irregular actions in all those
> working groups, that would have lead to appeals anyway regardless of
> who filed them.
[citation needed]
Paul
