Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-mlrsearch Title: Multiple Loss Ratio Search Reviewer: Lars Eggert Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-mlrsearch-?? Reviewer: Lars Eggert Review Date: 2025-08-08 IETF LC End Date: 2025-08-06 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This is ready to go with no issues that I can see. (A side note is that my re-reading of RFC 2544 doesn't leave me with the definitive algorithm that this I-D ascribes to that RFC. The relevant parts of RFC 2544 are extremely high-level, to the point of claiming it to specifying anything like a search algorithm is IMO a stretch. It might be that the benchmarking community has a shared set of assumptions around RFC 2544 that come into play here. Are those written down anywhere? Would be good to cite.) Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: Has a bunch of misspellings and formatting nits that the RPC can fix. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
