Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-mlrsearch Title: Multiple Loss Ratio Search Reviewer: Yoshifumi Nishida Review result: Ready with Nits This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review. I believe this document is well-written and almost ready for publication as an informational RFC. I think this document doesn't have transport related issues as the methodology described in the document is designed to be protocol-agnostic and doesn't specify any transport protocol specific requirements or conditions. One minor point I've noticed is how we should follow the 'Discussion' paragraphs in Section 4.While the paragraphs contain RFC2119 terms, I am not very sure if we should really follow the requirements as I have some impressions there might be some rooms for discussions. I think it would be better to clarify how the readers should follow the requirements in them. Thanks, -- Yoshi -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
