Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-prefer8781 Title: Recommendations for Discovering IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis Reviewer: David Lou Review result: Ready with Nits Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-prefer8781 Title: Recommendations for Discovering IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis Reviewer: David Lou This draft makes a recommendation to use RFC8781 instead of RFC7050 for PREF64 discovery. It's well written with clear arguments. A minor suggestion: Section 4 illustrates the existing issues of RFC7050. And some text here and there in the draft indicate the advantages of RFC8781. For instance, Section 1 states "This approach offers several advantages (Section 3 of [RFC8781]), including fate sharing with other host network configuration parameters." Section 4.5 states that RAs have defense mechanism. I wonder whether it would be better to have a couple of sentences explicitly stating that the RFC8781 mechanism tackles/solves those issues. It can be put either in section 1 or at the end of section 4. Regards David -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
