Bechet,
On Jul 29, 2025, at 8:56 AM, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On the other hand, I think the INT Area w.g. works pretty well at handling things like this.
INT area WG works like another working group not like an area WG.
Which means maybe we need another one, I could not come up with a name 😀 for intarea which has a diverse set of specific WGs. We don't have that. Maybe that's why they may have difficulty in finding ADs for Intarea.
Please explain. I am not sure I see a problem with the Int Area w.g. that would require another w.g. Seems to be working as defined in it’s charter:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intarea/about/
Bob
|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
