On 28 Jul 2025, at 14:59, Michael Richardson wrote:
Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> fwiw - when I was an AD dealing with the examples that Mike
mentions
> was just what the area workings groups (tsvwg, opswg, ...) were
created
> to handle
So I wouldn't get rid of the area catch-all working groups, they serve
some
purpose, but they do not successfully deal with what MSJ suggested.
They needn't be area-wide. Look at the charter for MAILMAINT. It appears
to be working well; a bit early for any big declarations of success.
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
