Document: draft-ietf-netconf-port-numbers Title: NETCONF Transport Port Numbers Reviewer: Michael Tüxen Review result: Ready with Nits This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review. I have only found the following three nits: 1. The abstract mentions that port number assignments that not stood the test of time are removed. However, the introduction mentions that also port number assignments are removed for which the protocols do not apply (like SSH/UDP). For consistency, I would list both motivations for assignment removal in the abstract and introduction. 2. The introduction mentions that "... many of these assignments are for a transport protocol (i.e., UDP) for which the requesting application does not apply" and then the document actually removes one. Maybe the use of "many" can be improved to be more precise. 3. The introduction mentions that "... many of the assignments are for protocols that are not deployed and were tagged as Historic" and then the document actually removes three. Maybe the use of "many" can be improved to be more precise. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx