Robert, Thanks for your review and comments on the NQB draft. I've taken your comments on board for draft-30. See below [GW] for details. -Greg On 6/18/25, 10:56 AM, "Robert Sparks via Datatracker" <noreply@xxxxxxxx <mailto:noreply@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb Title: A Non-Queue-Building Per-Hop Behavior (NQB PHB) for Differentiated Services Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Nits Summary: Ready with nits for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC The document has no art area specific issues to address. It does have an unusual requirement to hold publication on a missing Informative reference and intentionally points into the appendix of an obsoleted RFC. Nits/Questions: What does the first sentence of the third paragraph of section 4.1 add to the document? I think the document says the same thing with the sentence removed. [GW] You are correct. The sentence contained a normative keyword in an earlier version of the draft. In WG discussions we decided to eliminate the normative keyword, but didn't recognize that this left the sentence without a purpose. Everything in that sentence is already covered by the immediately preceding two paragraphs. I will delete it. In the fourth paragraph of section 4.1, should "consider implementing" be "consider using"? [GW] fine. At "microflow state is exhausted", consider something like "storage for microflow state is exhausted". [GW] I am going to leave this as is. This is a normative statement that covers all types of exhaustion of the microflow state. While storage exhaustion might be the most likely situation that would need to be designed for, I don't see a value in calling that out as the only sort of state exhaustion that needs to be considered. A personal editorial opinion - feel free to ignore it: Much of this document is written in a conversational tone. It has a structure that both repeats itself and has unusual backward references. The prose could be simplified in many places without changing the meaning. The result would be easier to read, particularly for readers having to perform translation. [GW] I will keep this in mind during further editing rounds. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
