Re: IETF 123 Final Agenda

["Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I’ll add my voice. I’m the primary author of 2026bis and 2418bis. .  I wrote privately to John and Roman (as AD) the other day and said:

                On a personal note, I agree that this is a really bad conflict for me.  ART/WIT is trying to deal with “json structure” proposal (I co-chair HTTPAPI which has been involved), there are some SEC items coming up that are important (merkle tree certs). I propose swapping with something from Monday IV session.

 

From: Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Allow me to echo John's grumble. That's a really bad conflict.

pr

On 28 Jun 2025, at 8:54, John C Klensin wrote:

> Really?  PROCON scheduled against ART+SEC+WIT DISPATCH in the first
> slot Monday?  Given many of those who have been active in procedural
> issues and the processes leading up to PROCON, seems to me that
> creates more conflicts than with almost any other combination.