Hi,
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the current case, where such a person is appealing WG/AD actions,
> then I think we should go even further to accommodate them, because> that is the right thing to do.
We should. But the main problem in this case is not the email address, but that the complaint was submitted as a self-hosted PDF. It's not clear that the PDF document is subject to the Note Well. The response invited the person to make a submission in email where that would be more clear.
We do tolerate those automatically inserted corporate email footers that contradict the Note Well, because you can't just make up your own rules as you send an email. In this case, the email could start with "This is a verbatim copy of <URL>...".
thanks,
Rob
