Re: Fully functional email address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



George,

+1.  
thanks,
    john


--On Monday, June 16, 2025 06:35 +0930 George Michaelson
<ggm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Email isn't dying. It is changing. I don't like the changes and I
> think you don't either but saying it's dying creates a false sense
> of doom around it.
> 
> I think this isn't the place to debate it. Centralisation of
> services is typified by what is happening to mail.
> 
> What matters here is the ground rules we set for ourselves in terms
> of expectations in email and behaviour in document production.
> 
> I think in that context "I refuse to use X because" isn't helpful.
> The mission is to engange on documents not to strike blows for
> email hosting freedoms.
> 
> G
> 
> (Personal opinion. Sent from a train on the Nullarbor plain using
> centrally managed monopolistic mail)
> 
> G
> 
> On Mon, 16 June 2025, 05:17 Christian Huitema,
> <huitema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On Jun 15, 2025, at 12:14 PM, Michael Richardson
>> > <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
> >
> > Paul Wout䩣㸀㸀 㸀 ᐀





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux