Document: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update Title: Prioritizing known-local IPv6 ULAs through address selection policy Reviewer: Jim Reid Review result: Ready with Nits I'm the dnsdir reviewer for this I-D. The draft has no significant DNS content: ie nothing that raises operational or protocol concerns for the DNS. From that perspective, the I-D is ready. Overall, the I-D is clear and well written. There are a couple of nits though: 1) "Behaviors" is a non-word that annoys me. There is no reason to pluralise behaviour (or even behavior). 2) The sentence beginning "Receiving a DNS response for a ULA destination..." in Section 8 is clumsy and should be restructured. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
