AD writes: > For more information on the IPR that may be associated with Kyber/ML-KEM There are three patent holders that claim coverage. "May be" is wildly understating the case. Furthermore, readers of the AD's message aren't being told that there's an active complaint saying that this draft (and another draft) violate two specific provisions of BCP 79. I've escalated the complaint to IAB now: https://cr.yp.to/2025/20250526-bcp-79.pdf ---D. J. Bernstein -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
