[Last-Call] draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol-14 ietf last call Opsdir review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Document: draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol
Title: Test Protocol for One-way IP Capacity Measurement
Reviewer: Tianran Zhou
Review result: Has Issues

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

In general, this document is clear to me. I did not see any special operational
or network management related issue. But there are several minor issues, for
the authors consideration.

minor issues:
1. In section 5.1
"testPort: The UDP ephemeral port number on the server that the client has to
use for the Test Activation Request and subsequent Load or Status PDUs."
Accorrding to 5.2.2, server will be assigned an UDP port after receiving a
request. Why the request carries the server test port? Do you mean the client
assigns the server test prot? But I am not sure if it's a safe mechanism.

2. In section 5.1
"maxBandwith: When this field is non-zero, it is a specification of the maximum
bit rate the client expects to send or receive during the requested test. The
server compares this value to its currently available configured limit for test
admission control. This field MAY be used for rate-limiting the maximum rate
the server should attempt. The maxBandwidth field's most significant bit, the
CHSR_USDIR_BIT, is set to 0 by default to indicate comment:"downstream" and has
to be set to 1 to indicate "upstream"." What's the unit of the maxBandwith,
bps, Bps, or Kbps or Mbps? I see you mentioned "bit rate". Do you indicate the
bps? I would suggest you to make it explicitly.

3. In section 5.1
"checkSum: An optional checksum of the entire PDU. The calculation is done with
the fields checksum, authMode and those following after authMode set to zero."
It seems the checkSum is optional. But I think it's mondatory if
auth/encryption is not on, in order to find out bit error.

4. In 6.1 Client Generates Test Activation Request
It seems some fields are not described, e.g., useOwDelVar,slowAdjThresh.

5. In 7.1 Test Packet PDU and Roles
I would suggest a dedicated section to describe the rate adjust algorithm. And
you can describe the state machine and para config, so as to better understand
the algorithm.

Cheers,
Tianran



-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux