Document: draft-ietf-drip-registries Title: DRIP Entity Tags (DET) in the Domain Name System (DNS) Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Has Nits I am the assigned OPSDIR for this document. I cannot claim any adequate understanding of the DRIP in general as it was a totally new topic to me. Anyway, having still read the document I think it is ready with nits. Editorial: * Title "DRIP Entity Tags (DET) in the Domain Name System (DNS)" just don't understand why using so may abbreviations in th title. I would use at most "DRIP Entity Tags in the Domain Name System" * The document uses heavily abbreviations from RFC9434 and RFC9374. Sometimes (in most case) these are still expanded but sometimes not. Good example is DRIP itself. I would urge some better consistency with abbreviations. Also, it would be great to state that abbreviations and definitions of e.g. these two mentioned RFCs are used. * RAA and HDA 14 scheme is somewhat confusing on the first read. Having a "2 bit at time" illustrated example somewhere is Section 6.2.1 would be great to show how RAA gets shifted by 2 bits etc in the final IPV6 address. Substantial: * Section 3 second paragraph: "delegation. As such the IPv6 prefix of RAAs are 2001:3x:xxx::/44 and HDAs are 2001:3x:xxxy:yy::/56 with respective nibble reverse domains" I believe both prefix examples are wrong and should be 2001:3x:xxx0::/44 and HDA 2001:3x:xxxy:yy00::/56 -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
