Hi,
thanks,
Rob
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 4:39 PM Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@xxxxxx> wrote:
Or you could learn to use procmail.On Apr 20, 2025, at 16:34, Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 4:28 PM John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
--On Sunday, April 20, 2025 16:15 -0700 Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> It's unilateral. Here's what a request to not send these things
> looks like:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/agsb5SpPCXn2XwSVa
> FHSMQ4pIRE/
But that is part of the history to which I was referring -- a
decision to continue generating the summary for the ietf list and
send it out to that list, but to not generate it or send it out to
any other list, including, in that case, the gendispatch one.No, that's not quite what happened. It was unilateral. The summary email went out after being asked to stop. It might have been unintentional, but it was nevertheless unilateral.I suppose it is time for Stephen and I to step back and let either
John Levine or Roman respond; I will now do so.Or, we could just stop sending bogo-summary emails to the list from individual email addresses. If people want it, just let it come from ietf-summary@ietf.thanks,RobOle J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Office: +1 415-550-9433
Cell: +1 415-370-4628Docomo: +81 90 3337-9311
