Perfect; thanks so much!
Barry
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 2:46 PM Sean Turner <sean@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 17, 2025, at 7:21 AM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Reviewer: Barry Leiba
Review result: Ready with Nits
This document is in good shape and does what it needs to do. I have just one
very minor substantive comment, and two very nitty nits:
— Section 3.1 —
If the
"Recommended" column is set to "D" the item is discouraged and
SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT be used.
That seems a little odd, and I wonder whether some readers of the note (who
don’t look here for the definition of “D”) might be confused about whether it’s
SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT. Perhaps this?:
NEW-1
If the "Recommended" column is set to "D" the item is discouraged and SHOULD
NOT or MUST NOT be used; consult the item’s references to understand the
situation. END
…or maybe…
NEW-2
If the "Recommended" column is set to "D" the item is discouraged and SHOULD
NOT or MUST NOT be used, depending upon the situation; consult the item’s
references for clarity. ENDFixed via: https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/72/files— Section 3 —
Nit in the definition of “N”: “leave an items” -> “leave an item”.Also “basis of it having” -> “basis of its having”, as standard practice uses
possessive pronouns with gerunds.Cheers,spt
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
