On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 03:28:16PM +0000, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) wrote: > From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > * Raw Public Keys (RPK). There is no definitive description of Raw > > > Public Keys in TLS 1.3 at time of writing, so [RFC7250] must be > > > used in context of [RFC8446]. The details of RPK are considered > > > out-of-scope for this document. Please refer to the RFCs above > > > for implementation, deployment, and security considerations. > > > > Please remove the disclaimers. I see no lack of clarity about TLS 1.3 > > RPKs in RFC8446 Section 4.4.2: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446#section-4.4.2 > > > > It is important to not misrepresent the handling of RPKs in TLS 1.3. > > Certainly, we will remove that comment from the doc. > > PROPOSED NEW TEXT: > * Raw Public Keys (RPK). The details of RPK are considered out-of- > scope for this document. Please refer to [RFC7250] and > Section 4.4.2 of [RFC8446] for implementation, deployment, and > security considerations. Thanks, I belive this addresses my comment. -- Viktor. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
